1-(2-Chloroethoxy)propane: Understanding Its Role and Relevance
Historical Development
Industrial chemistry often grows out of practical needs, and 1-(2-Chloroethoxy)propane stands as evidence of this trend. Back in the early to mid-20th century, as processes for producing synthetic ethers advanced, chemists experimented with various halogenated derivatives to enhance reactivity and versatility in organic synthesis. This compound came into the picture as groups pushed initial boundaries with etherification reactions involving chlorinated intermediates. By the 1960s, more reliable preparation methods brought this chemical to prominence among researchers eyeing specialty solvents and functional intermediates for synthesizing new materials, pharmaceuticals, and agrochemicals. Books and articles from that era, found gathering dust on enough academic shelves, show a steady rise in citations mentioning chloroethoxy derivatives due to their potential in electrophilic substitution and cross-coupling reactions. Over time, learning how to wield this compound safely and effectively became a marker of progress for many chemical engineering labs.
Product Overview
1-(2-Chloroethoxy)propane often makes its way into a chemist’s toolkit as a clear, colorless to pale yellow liquid, not striking at first glance but revealing its significance through utility. Industrial suppliers typically offer it in tightly sealed drums or glass bottles to prevent moisture contamination and unnecessary exposure. Because it reacts with a range of nucleophiles, manufacturers and research labs tap its potential as a versatile intermediate, either producing more complex organic molecules or adjusting surface properties in coatings and resins. In my own experience working alongside folks in process chemistry, batches of this compound sometimes arrived alongside technical bulletins warning about its reactivity and storage needs—pointing to the chemical’s role as both an opportunity and a challenge on the lab bench.
Physical & Chemical Properties
This liquid doesn’t stay quiet for long. Its molecular formula, C5H11ClO, gives a molar mass just under 122 g/mol. Boiling points tend to hover in the 150–154 °C range, a figure that suggests moderate volatility and calls for proper lab ventilation. Density settles around 1.01 g/cm³ at 25 °C, lining up with many other chlorinated ethers. Immiscible with water, it dissolves readily in organic solvents like dichloromethane, diethyl ether, and ethanol. Because the ether bond shows resilience under neutral or mildly basic conditions, you can often expect this molecule to hold together unless strong acids or bases enter the mix. Its chloro substituent sets the stage for reactions—this structural quirk lets operators build new connections where other ethers fall short.
Technical Specifications & Labeling
Accurate labeling and documentation spell the difference between safe handling and hazardous misadventure. Product drums and bottles typically show a CAS number (at one point, 6286-30-2 for this compound) alongside the purity level, which often tops 97% for research and industrial use. Labels might spell out warnings drawn from the Globally Harmonized System: flammable liquid, health hazard, harmful if ingested or inhaled, and irritant to the eyes, skin, and respiratory tract. Certificates of analysis go deeper, listing impurity profiles, moisture content, and residual solvent levels. Those details shape how users approach the material; knowing exactly what’s inside the drum shields staff and end users from unwanted surprises.
Preparation Method
Some preparation routes date back to classic organic synthesis. The go-to method for making 1-(2-Chloroethoxy)propane relies on the Williamson ether synthesis, which starts with 2-chloroethanol and 1-bromopropane (or the reverse, depending on reagent access). Under basic conditions—think sodium or potassium carbonate—the nucleophilic substitution sputters to life, giving the desired product along with the salts formed as byproducts. Traditional approaches favored liquid-liquid reactors, where careful temperature control minimized side reactions and ensured reproducibility. On a larger scale, continuous-flow reactors have gained ground, offering smoother temperature profiles and better containment. In my own lab days, the unmistakable odor of starting haloalkanes lingered long after we’d stopped working, a reminder that even simple synthesis brings practical challenges.
Chemical Reactions & Modifications
Chemists keen on functional group transformations often pivot around the chloro group attached to the ethoxy moiety. Nucleophilic substitution stands out—amines, thiols, and alkoxides displace the chlorine atom, ushering in new functionalities and opening up the field for pharmaceuticals, agrochemicals, or specialty polymers. This molecule also serves as a substrate for Grignard reactions and other organometallic additions, pushing synthetic boundaries in the hunt for complexity. Oxidation and reduction pathways haven’t gotten as much play, since the stable ether bond keeps those changes at bay unless really aggressive conditions step into the picture. Looking at literature reports, the compound’s chemical flexibility appears again and again, especially in schemes that demand selective activation without shredding the core structure.
Synonyms & Product Names
Your search for 1-(2-Chloroethoxy)propane might turn up names like 2-Chloroethyl n-propyl ether, n-Propyl 2-chloroethyl ether, or even “Propane, 1-(2-chloroethoxy)-.” Traders and suppliers occasionally abbreviate it as CEEPE or just lump it under “chlorinated ethers” for bulk shipments. In my experience, variations in naming often create confusion, so cross-checking CAS numbers and molecular formulas becomes a routine habit for anyone working with international partners or translating research protocols.
Safety & Operational Standards
Working with this class of chemicals means sticking to clear safety standards. The chloro group brings both flammability and toxicity concerns—a combination that has led to near-misses in both academic and production settings. Standard protocol means using chemical-resistant gloves, splash goggles, and well-fitted lab coats. Fume hoods or explosion-proof enclosures take center stage during dispensing and reaction steps. Emergency eyewash stations and spill kits shouldn’t just gather dust in a corner; in fast-paced settings, quick response gear often means the difference between a scare and a reportable incident. Waste disposal routines follow hazardous organic waste guidelines, and facilities with regular turnover train new operators carefully on both risks and first-aid responses.
Application Area
This compound’s unique profile has carved a niche across several industries. Manufacturers often look to it as a building block for specialty pharmaceuticals, where the ether linkage brings stability and the chlorine offers a tactical site for further transformation. Agricultural chemists have used it in synthesizing intermediates for crop protection agents, targeting pests while aiming for minimal residue. Resin and polymer manufacturers sometimes turn to 1-(2-Chloroethoxy)propane for custom cross-linking reactions or to impart specific physical properties. Analytical researchers have even tapped this molecule for use as a derivatization agent, improving the detection of volatile analytes. In many cases, it’s the reactivity of the chloro group that puts this compound into the hands of innovators chasing the next generation of products.
Research & Development
Ongoing R&D ties closely to both the molecule’s baseline properties and its reactive points. Recent years have seen researchers exploring greener synthetic routes, shifting toward phase-transfer catalysis and ionic liquids to cut down on waste and improve selectivity. Several academic groups have published studies exploring new substitution patterns and custom tailoring of this ether to produce targeted drugs, especially in fields where metabolic stability represents a roadblock. Some industrial labs have leveraged automation and high-throughput analysis to design faster, safer screening of this chemical with other synthesis partners. Collaborations between universities and private industry often hinge on data-sharing agreements that unlock detailed reaction profiles, yielding smarter patents and more sustainable processes. In the process development world, optimizing purification and containment stands out as a persistent challenge, especially as regulatory agencies push for tighter controls on halogenated byproducts.
Toxicity Research
Questions about health impact drive a lot of the conversation around halogenated ethers. Early animal studies flagged potential respiratory and liver toxicity for related compounds, prompting stricter controls and in-depth exploration of exposure pathways. More recent data point to skin and eye irritation, as well as possible mutagenicity under chronic exposure. Occupational safety agencies and chemical companies have pooled resources to run longer-term exposure studies, aiming to pinpoint safe handling procedures and threshold limits for workers. In my own lab circles, even rumors about toxicity often led to scrupulous record-keeping and cross-checking of MSDS sheets each time the chemical came off the stock shelf. Environmental fate studies also remain active, as researchers track degradation rates and byproduct formation in soil and groundwater after accidental release.
Future Prospects
The scientific community keeps pressing for safer, more sustainable approaches to old standbys like 1-(2-Chloroethoxy)propane. Many chemists see the future in precise functionalization and the push for minimizing side products or toxic waste. Regulatory agencies keep raising the bar, so advances in monitoring, containment, and green synthesis will likely shape how companies and academics approach this molecule over the next decade. Demand for tailored pharmaceutical and specialty chemical intermediates keeps this ether in play, but public health considerations and greener alternatives may eventually nudge it aside in some settings. For all its practical strengths, ongoing efforts to balance utility, environmental safety, and workplace health will chart the path ahead.
Breaking Down the Basics
Curiosity often takes me down chemical rabbit holes, and 1-(2-Chloroethoxy)propane grabbed my attention because it rarely shows up in household casual talk, yet pops up in industrial circles. Its molecular structure—a propane backbone connected by a chloroethoxy group—makes it more than a tongue twister. This stuff matters, largely due to its role as an intermediate in chemical synthesis.
Where 1-(2-Chloroethoxy)propane Actually Shows Up
In real life, I’ve seen that specialty chemicals like this don’t headline consumer products. Instead, they help make a whole range of items that impact daily routines, sometimes in ways most folks never realize. The backbone of 1-(2-Chloroethoxy)propane finds a place in the development of pharmaceutical compounds and agrochemicals. In my time around process chemists, I noticed this compound gets picked for custom reactions because the chloro group introduces reactivity, and the ethoxy chain gives flexibility in building more complex molecules.
How Industry Put This Chemical to Work
Pharmaceutical companies use it as a starting point to add new chemical functionalities or to access harder-to-reach molecular scaffolds. Pharmaceutical synthesis doesn’t always bring big yields; minor improvements in chemical routes can save loads of time and energy. Engineers aiming to streamline a drug pathway latch onto intermediates like this, cutting down the steps required to introduce an oxygenated or chlorinated group in a molecule. That keeps both production costs and waste down.
Agrochemical development—think pesticides, herbicides, fungicides—leans on intermediates for similar reasons. In my experience, these fields don’t seek out 1-(2-Chloroethoxy)propane itself for its own effects but for what chemists can build from it. The compound holds value as a reactive building block—something like the bolts on an assembly line.
Safety Concerns Around 1-(2-Chloroethoxy)propane
Chemists approach this compound with the same caution they show other low-volume or specialty reagents. Chloro-ethers hold known health risks, so direct exposure isn’t taken lightly. Short stints in research labs taught me that good ventilation, gloves, and goggles aren’t optional. Industrial hygiene experts recommend minimizing inhalation and skin contact at every step, which matters because accidental spills or inhalation can mean immediate visits to the medical station.
The broader risk comes from handling large amounts in industrial facilities. Chemical spills, accidental releases, or poor storage can lead to lasting contamination in waterways or soil. I’ve seen chemical manufacturers double down on training sessions to cut down such events, but best practices only work if everyone follows them, not just the folks being supervised.
Looking for Safer and Smarter Solutions
Safety doesn’t begin and end with PPE and standard operating procedures. Real solutions need more than box-ticking. Substituting with greener alternatives—those without unnecessary chlorine—often makes environmental sense. The catch: greener chemistry isn’t always an easy fit in older factories or among clients with specific performance or cost expectations. Supporting research into alternative pathways and investing in process upgrades helps keep these chemicals from becoming a long-term environmental problem.
Anyone who spends time around synthesis understands every step leaves a footprint. Watching the industry experiment with bio-based feedstocks and stricter environmental controls gives me hope that future uses of chemicals like 1-(2-Chloroethoxy)propane will shrink the risks both for the folks on the factory floor and the world downstream.
Digging Into the Structure
1-(2-Chloroethoxy)propane isn’t some impossible chemical you’ll never meet outside a textbook. Science labs and research centers face compounds like these all the time—especially anyone interested in organic synthesis, solvents, or fine chemical manufacturing. Let’s break down what this name actually points to in the hands-on, get-your-hands-dirty way real chemistry happens.
Chemical Formula Explained
The name gives away its structure if you picture chemical building blocks instead of just reading labels. Start with propane: three carbons in a linear chain, simple enough—see it as C3H8. Now, swap out one hydrogen with an “ethoxy” group, which brings two carbons and an oxygen as a branch. That creates something like C3H7OC2H4-. The “2-chloro” part means a chlorine atom attaches to the second carbon of the ethoxy group. Bring it all together and you get C5H11ClO. It sounds more complicated than it looks on paper, but stepwise construction always brings clarity.
Calculating Molecular Weight: No Rocket Science, Just Arithmetic
Anyone who’s spent hours hovering over a calculator and a periodic table will recognize the process here. Each element has a standard atomic weight: carbon clocks in at about 12.01 g/mol, hydrogen at 1.01 g/mol, chlorine at 35.45 g/mol, and oxygen at 16.00 g/mol. For this compound:
- Carbon: 5 × 12.01 = 60.05
- Hydrogen: 11 × 1.01 = 11.11
- Chlorine: 1 × 35.45 = 35.45
- Oxygen: 1 × 16.00 = 16.00
Add it all up, and you land on 122.61 g/mol. Many online databases will confirm this. The exact decimal points may shift ever so slightly depending on the edition of your periodic table, but if you see results close to this, you’re on the right track.
Why This Matters
Details like accurate formulas and weights play a bigger role than folks sometimes admit outside of a classroom. If researchers get these numbers mixed up, entire batches of chemicals might be tainted or dangerous. Misidentifying the composition throws off dosing calculations and can ruin laboratory experiments or even scale up waste in pharmaceutical settings. Getting the molecular weight right ensures stoichiometric calculations are accurate for reactions. No business or university has cash to spill down the drain chasing mysteries born from miscalculations.
Troubles and Real-World Solutions
Even trained professionals sometimes stumble when reading IUPAC names, especially for compounds with multiple functional groups. ChemDraw and similar software help, but reliance on digital tools won’t fix underlying confusion. Maintaining physical model kits and sketching out structures before jumping to formulas teaches a deeper kind of chemical literacy. Checking against trusted databases like PubChem or Reaxys safeguards against human error. Building these basic habits into any workflow prevents small mistakes from snowballing into big problems.
Bringing it Home
Chemistry is a field where details count. Whether measuring out a reagent or scaling a process for industry, people depend on the accuracy in chemical identification and calculation. Getting the formula C5H11ClO and the molecular weight 122.61 g/mol for 1-(2-Chloroethoxy)propane right the first time sends ripple effects through the entire process—making good science and good business that much more achievable.
Most of us don’t run into 1-(2-Chloroethoxy)propane on a regular basis. The name itself sounds straight out of a lab manual, and that’s usually where you’ll find it. But with chemicals like this one, understanding the risks means a whole lot if you work with them or if they show up anywhere away from professional labs.
What Happens With Contact?
Chlorinated compounds deserve respect. This one contains both a chlorine atom and an ether bond, both known for causing trouble under some conditions. Nobody should assume safety just because a chemical isn’t well known. I’ve read reports showing skin contact with similar compounds can bring rashes or burning sensations. If inhaled, vapor or tiny droplets can irritate airways. None of this feels theoretical—my old chemistry lab always doubled up on gloves and respirators when these types of chemicals were on the table. It’s not paranoia. It’s experience.
Not All Hazards Get Noticed Right Away
Repeated exposure or poor ventilation can add up. Chlorinated organics in general sometimes get absorbed through skin or linger in tissues. It reminds me of older solvents like carbon tetrachloride: nobody thought much of it until liver damage piled up in workers. Regulations have gotten tougher after decades of mistakes. With 1-(2-Chloroethoxy)propane, we’re lacking piles of research, but structural similarities to known hazardous chemicals point toward caution.
Environmental Impact Isn’t Just About Spills
Disposal matters for chemicals like this. My local water board sends out notices about improper dumping or spills each year. One careless move in an industrial setting, or a leaky container at home, can put groundwater at risk. Chlorinated chemicals often stick around in soil and water longer than people expect. The risk doesn’t vanish even if the smell does. If a substance can affect aquatic life or accumulate in animals, people living downstream wind up dealing with the fallout.
What Regulations Say
OSHA and international agencies issue guidelines based on testing, animal studies, and lessons from workplaces. Sometimes you get detailed exposure limits. In other cases, like with 1-(2-Chloroethoxy)propane, no hard numbers exist because nobody tested it deeply yet. In the absence of detailed rules, the rule of thumb says “treat unknown organochlorines as hazardous until proven otherwise.” I wouldn’t work with it without full PPE. I certainly wouldn’t let kids near it, or use it where food is prepared or stored. Companies who handle this stuff regularly should share Safety Data Sheets with all workers, update training, and ensure proper ventilation systems function.
Practical Ways Forward
Engineering controls, like fume hoods, cut worker exposure. Good gloves and eye protection make a difference every day. If you spot a spill, follow up with cleanup for both liquid and vapor, and keep records for inspections. Some smaller labs or hobbyists forget that safe storage also matters—sturdy containers, clear labeling, and avoiding excess stock help limit hazards. If handling seems risky or confusing, reach out to chemical safety experts or poison control instead of guessing.
Everybody deserves to feel secure while working. Nobody plans on accidents, but chemicals like this one underscore the need for respect, preparation, and a pinch of healthy skepticism about what we think we know.
Why Storage and Handling Matter
Nobody wants a safety scare in the lab or factory. I remember prepping for a simple synthesis and getting tripped up by poor chemical labeling. Simple mistakes, like storing chemicals where they shouldn’t be, often come from cutting corners. With 1-(2-Chloroethoxy)propane, the risks multiply: it’s not a chemical you just shelve wherever you like. Unpredictable leaks or reactions can endanger people and ruin work. Storing and handling it right isn’t just a best practice—it's essential for health and productivity.
Practical Storage Tips
Suitable storage for a compound like this starts with temperature. Steer clear of heat sources or places with fluctuating temperatures. Stash it in a cool, dry spot, away from sunlight and sparks. I’ve seen poor climate control mess up entire shipments of similar reagents, especially in summer. The right setup doesn’t just protect workers—you get more value out of every purchase by preserving chemical quality longer.
Containers should be tightly sealed, preferably glass or a stable, compatible plastic. Metal lids or cheap seals might corrode or react, making things worse. On more than one occasion, I’ve seen sticky leaks on shelves because staff trusted the wrong kind of lid, leading to unnecessary chemical exposure. Secure, chemical-resistant containers pay for themselves.
Handling with Safety in Mind
Nobody likes PPE, but skipping gear when working with volatile compounds is asking for trouble. I always reach for chemical-resistant gloves and goggles before moving or measuring substances like 1-(2-Chloroethoxy)propane. Long-sleeved lab coats stop accidental splashes from reaching skin. Occasionally some folks cut corners thinking, “It won’t happen to me”—until it does. Systematic safety training and supervision help form good habits.
Always use a fume hood or ventilated area. Breathing this stuff in can irritate airways. My old lab had a sensor that picked up nasty vapors in record time, averting emergencies more than once. Ventilation isn’t just a precaution—it's a must for this kind of chemistry.
Responding to Mishaps
Even with safeguards, spills or exposure can happen. Quick access to safety showers, eyewash stations, and absorbent spill kits makes a difference. The right kit absorbs and contains chemical spills, especially on non-porous surfaces. Once, we had a minor spill—having everyone trained and ready turned what could have been a panic moment into a controlled cleanup.
Waste gets handled as hazardous. Don’t pour leftovers down the drain or toss rags in the common trash. Local environmental rules carry weight for a reason: they stop toxins from reaching the community. Label all waste containers clearly and set regular pickups for contaminated materials.
What Works: Solutions That Stick
Routine checks, clear labeling, and written standards keep everyone safe and workflows smooth. Make sure training isn’t just an annual video, but an ongoing conversation. Small investments—labels that resist solvent drips, reliable spill kits, proper PPE—build trust. Everyone from the newest intern to lab veterans stays safer and works better.
If these basics get overlooked, risks for accidents shoot up. Tight controls, practical storage, and a safety-first mindset keep workplace disasters out of the headlines. For anyone responsible for 1-(2-Chloroethoxy)propane, these habits don’t just tick compliance boxes—they protect people, equipment, and the environment every single day.
Chemical Procurement Isn’t Just About Price
Anyone looking for 1-(2-Chloroethoxy)propane knows it isn’t on every store shelf. This compound plays a quiet but crucial role in research, specialty synthesis, and sometimes, in controlled industrial settings. Companies or individuals with a need for bulk orders usually start their search online. They check chemical supply companies, both local and international, sifting through catalogs instead of just typing into a consumer retail search. This approach absorbs time and patience, mostly because handling chemicals responsibly hasn’t gotten any simpler over the years.
Legitimate Sourcing and Safety Rules
Plenty of suppliers post product listings for bulk chemicals. Sigma-Aldrich, Thermo Fisher Scientific, and Alfa Aesar stand out as reputable names, with established track records and clear stands on safety and compliance. They rarely sell outright to just anyone. Orders for chemicals like this get screened: buyers need organization details, reason for purchase, sometimes even end-use declarations and licenses, especially if there’s international shipping involved. This keeps dangerous substances away from bad actors and protects company reputations.
Trying to skip these steps risks more than just a rejected order—it can carry legal trouble or, at the very least, scrutiny from customs or law enforcement. News stories about chemical misuse usually trace things back to holes in the procurement process. Legitimate buyers learn the ropes and stick to dealers with trackable records, solid safety data sheets, and verifiable business credentials.
Bulk Isn’t Always Easy—or Necessary
Chemists understand that sourcing a bulk supply carries real hazards and storage headaches. Flammable compounds add fire risk to every month in the warehouse, and certain solvents or chlorinated ethers can trigger health or environmental concerns if leaks or spills happen. Anyone thinking of placing a bulk order should know the staff and storage standards meet all legal and environmental rules. It pays to know how to read a Safety Data Sheet and to set up safe handling procedures, even if regulators haven’t come calling yet. Oversight agencies, from OSHA in the U.S. to REACH rules in Europe, have tightened up expectations for tracking not just use, but disposal, emissions, and emergency response plans.
Why Bulk Orders Matter—and Responsibility
Some readers may wonder if anyone really needs gallons of a compound whose name they can barely pronounce. Specialized labs, pharmaceutical companies, and component manufacturers build their operations around intermediates like this. Their work—for new medicines, battery components, or advanced plastics—occasionally demands bulk purchases. They also form relationships with suppliers who not only deliver stock but provide shipment tracking, traceability, and emergency contacts.
Not for DIY Chemistry
No matter how easy certain online marketplaces make it seem, these chemicals never belong in home labs or amateur operations. Domestic and international regulators track precursors for controlled substances for a reason. Professionals get training. They use glove boxes, fume hoods, fire suppression, and chemical spill kits. Anyone who isn’t prepared for stringent protocols shouldn’t handle or purchase bulk chemicals. That extends far beyond legal consequences: mishandling a compound like this threatens lives and the environment.
Responsible Sourcing: Doing It Right
Purchasing 1-(2-Chloroethoxy)propane in quantity comes down to one rule: Work through verified distributors, with transparent documentation and safety plans in place. Cutting corners means cutting out safety and legal protection. If your company genuinely needs this material, apply for the right permits, get certified hazard training, and invest in storage and spill control measures.
Chemistry has always advanced behind the scenes, often carried by compounds with tongue-twisting names. That progress stands on the trust that buyers and sellers approach their business with care, expertise, and attention to safety.
| Names | |
| Preferred IUPAC name | 1-(2-chloroethoxy)propane |
| Other names |
1-Propoxy-2-chloroethane
2-Chloroethoxypropane |
| Pronunciation | /ˈwʌn tuː ˈklɔːrəʊ ɪˈθɒksi ˈprəʊpeɪn/ |
| Identifiers | |
| CAS Number | 108-42-9 |
| 3D model (JSmol) | `C(COCCCl)CC` |
| Beilstein Reference | 1637809 |
| ChEBI | CHEBI:89534 |
| ChEMBL | CHEMBL143245 |
| ChemSpider | 167369 |
| DrugBank | DB08583 |
| ECHA InfoCard | 07e691b0-6417-4c14-86c6-3aca4a9127b8 |
| EC Number | 217-973-9 |
| Gmelin Reference | 82867 |
| KEGG | C19200 |
| MeSH | D017209 |
| PubChem CID | 12411870 |
| RTECS number | UF0900000 |
| UNII | 4L7QS51Z8E |
| UN number | UN1993 |
| CompTox Dashboard (EPA) | DTXSID9093756 |
| Properties | |
| Chemical formula | C5H11ClO |
| Molar mass | 122.59 g/mol |
| Appearance | Colorless liquid |
| Odor | sweet |
| Density | 0.982 g/mL at 25 °C (lit.) |
| Solubility in water | Insoluble |
| log P | 0.98 |
| Vapor pressure | 0.7 mmHg (at 20 °C) |
| Acidity (pKa) | Acidity (pKa): 15.9 |
| Basicity (pKb) | pKb = 4.06 |
| Magnetic susceptibility (χ) | -53.18·10^-6 cm³/mol |
| Refractive index (nD) | 1.418 |
| Viscosity | 2.29 mPa·s (25 °C) |
| Dipole moment | 2.10 D |
| Thermochemistry | |
| Std molar entropy (S⦵298) | 367.6 J·mol⁻¹·K⁻¹ |
| Std enthalpy of formation (ΔfH⦵298) | -152.8 kJ/mol |
| Std enthalpy of combustion (ΔcH⦵298) | -2026.7 kJ/mol |
| Pharmacology | |
| ATC code | |
| Hazards | |
| GHS labelling | GHS02, GHS07 |
| Pictograms | GHS02,GHS07 |
| Signal word | Warning |
| Hazard statements | H302, H315, H319, H335 |
| Precautionary statements | P261, P264, P271, P301+P312, P305+P351+P338, P337+P313 |
| NFPA 704 (fire diamond) | 1-1-0 |
| Flash point | 93 °C |
| Autoignition temperature | 215°C |
| Explosive limits | Explosive limits: 1.0–7.5% |
| Lethal dose or concentration | LD50 (oral, rat): 2380 mg/kg |
| LD50 (median dose) | LD50 (median dose): 3000 mg/kg (rat, oral) |
| NIOSH | PCG |
| PEL (Permissible) | PEL: Not established |
| REL (Recommended) | 0.1 ppm (0.5 mg/m3) |
| Related compounds | |
| Related compounds |
1-(2-Bromoethoxy)propane
1-(2-Iodoethoxy)propane 1-(2-Fluoroethoxy)propane 1-(2-Chloroethoxy)butane 1-(2-Chloroethoxy)ethane 1-(2-Chloroethoxy)pentane 1-(3-Chloropropoxy)propane 1-Propoxy-2-chloroethane |
